Predicting Self-determinism: Role of Charismatic Leadership and Mentoring Effectiveness among Physical Education Teachers of Higher Education Institutes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2022.20.2.10Keywords:
Charismatic leadership, Mentoring Effectiveness, Self-Determination, Physical educationAbstract
The current study aimed to find the relationship between charismatic leadership, mentoring effectiveness and self-determination in physical education instructors. It was hypothesized that there would be a negative relationship between charismatic leadership and mentoring effectiveness and a positive relationship between charismatic leadership and self-determination. Charismatic leadership and mentoring effectiveness would be significant positive predictors of self-determination. Data were collected from male physical education teachers from Lahore using a convenient sampling. The research findings indicate that instructors with strategic vision, sensitivity to the environment, and sensitivity to members’ needs have a high awareness of themselves and their perceived choices. There were non-significant family systems, educational differences, and income differences in self-determination among physical education instructors. = This study would help explore leadership styles in connection to mentoring effectiveness and self-determination for better teaching efficacy and the development of academia. Future research can include female teachers and cities other than Lahore.
Downloads
References
Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23 (3), 402-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257
Alheeta, A., Ahmad, A., Ahmad, Y., & Mohamed, S. (2021). The effect of leadership styles on employees’ innovative work behavior. Management Science Letters, 11, 239–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.010
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K. & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: the role of personality, higher-order goals and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0479
Bronkhorst B., Steijn B., & Vermeeren B. (2015). Transformational leadership, goal setting, and work motivation: the case of a Dutch municipality. Review Public Personality Administration, 35, 124–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13515486
Campbell, C.M., Smith, M., Dugan, J.P. & Komives S.R. (2012). Mentors and college Student leadership outcomes: The importance of position and process. The Review of Higher Education, 35(4), 595-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0037
Carlo, O., Jean, F., & Boudrias, A. (2015). Linking managerial practices and leadership style to innovative work behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 545-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0131
Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, IS, 439-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150508
Drake J.K. (2011). The role of academic advising in student retention and persistence. AboutCampus, 16(3), 8-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20062
Eby, L.T., & Dolan, E.L. (2015). Mentoring in postsecondary education and organizational settings. In APA Handbook of Career International, Volume 2: Applications, P.J. Hartung, M.L.Savickas, and W.B. Walsh, eds., Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14439-028
Eisenbeiss, S., Knippenberg, D. & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438-1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012716
Janssen, O., & Yperen, N. W., (2004). Employees’ goal orientations the quality of leader member exchange and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/20159587
Kark, R., Van Dijk, D. & Vashdi, D. (2018). Motivated or demotivated to be creative: The role of self‐regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes. Applied Psychology, 67(1), 186-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12122
Kelloway E. K., Barling J., & Helleur J. (2000). Enhancing transformational leadership: the roles of training and feedback. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 21 145–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730010325022
Kurt, İ. & Yahyagil, M. Y. (2015). Universal values, creative behavior and leadership: Turkish Case. International Business Research, 8(6), 89-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n6p89
Meyer J. P., Stanley D. J., Herscovitch L., Topolnytsky L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 61 20–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
Mitchell M. A., & Maxwell S. E. (2013). A comparison of the cross-sectional and sequential designs when assessing longitudinal mediation. Multivar. Behav. Res. 48 301–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.784696
O’Brien M., Llamas M, & Stevens E. (2012). Lessons learned from four years of per mentoringin a tiered group program within education, Journal of the Australia and New Zealand StudentServices Association, 40, 7-15.
Pounder, D., & Crow, G. (2005). Developing and sustaining the pipeline of school leaders. Educational Leadership, 62(8), 56–60
Saks A. M., & Belcourt M. (2006). An investigation of training activities and transfer of training in organizations. Hum. Resour. Manage. 45 629–648. 10.1002/hrm.20135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20135
Škudienė, V., Augutytė, I., Demeško, N. & Suchockis, A. (2018). Exploring the relationship between innovative work behavior and leadership: moderating effect of locus of control. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 21-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2018.10.00002
Sheldon K. M., Kasser T., Smith K., & Share T. (2002). Personal goals and psychological growth: testing an intervention to enhance goal attainment and personality integration. J. Pers. 70 5–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00176
Sosik J. J., & Dinger S. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: the moderating role of need for approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. Leadership. Quart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.004
Takala, T. (2005). Charismatic Leadership and Power. Problems and Perspectives in Management , 45-57.
Thirty H, & Laursen S.L. (2011). The role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticingundergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. Journal of Science Educationand Technology, 20, 771-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9271-2
Wright B. E., Moynihan D. P., & Pandey S. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration. Rev. 72 206–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x
Yonezawa, S., Jones, M., & Joselowsky, F. (2009). Youth engagement in high schools: Developing a multidimensional, critical approach to improving engagement for all students. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 191-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9106-1
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall,
Pearson Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abdul Sami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright: The Authors
