Gender-Based Labour Force Participation and Wage Gap in Pakistan: Does Globalization Matter.

Authors

  • Moniba Sana Department of Economics, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan
  • Atif Ali Jaffri Department of Economics, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2020.18.1.10

Keywords:

Globalisation, Labor Force Participation, Rate Differential, Wage Differential.

Abstract

This study has investigated the impact of globalisation on gender-based gaps in the labor market (GBGLM) of Pakistan for the period 1982-2017. Particularly, the study has estimated the impact of trade openness(OPEN), foreign direct investment (FDI), workers’ remittance inflows(WRI) and exchange rate(ER) on gender-based labour force participation rate differential (LFPRD) and wage differential (WD). The study has applied the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model and Johansen’s cointegration approach on two models estimated for LFPRD and WD. The error correction models (ECM) have confirmed an error correction mechanism as reflected by negative and significant coefficients of lagged ECM terms. The study has applied all relevant diagnostic tests to ensure the validity of empirical findings. The results of the study indicated that in the long run, OPEN reduced LFPRD and WD, whereas, FDI augmented LFPRD. ER depreciation decreased LFPRD and augmented WD. WRI also augmented LFPRD and WD. The study concluded that OPEN and Real GDP are prominent factors in reducing WD and LFPRD of Pakistan, whereas, FDI and WRI augmented LFPRD. This is a very important finding in the context of the stagnant real sector of Pakistan where agriculture and industry have performed lower than rapidly growing services sector of Pakistan. Since most of the exports emanate from the real sector of Pakistan, therefore, relatively more focus on real sector as compared to financial inflows can play a crucial role in reducing GBGLM of Pakistan. The policy implication based on results is that to reduce GBGLM of Pakistan, trade liberalisation with special focus on the commodity-producing sector is right policy option in Pakistan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, P. (2006). Labor supply, School attendance, and remittances from international migration: the case of El Salvador: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3903

Aguayo-Tellez, E., Airola, J., Juhn, C., & Villegas-Sanchez, C. (2014). Did trade liberalisation help women? The case of Mexico in the 1990s New analyses of worker well-being (pp. 1-35): Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0147-9121(2013)0000038001

Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics, 15(4), 667-682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100078

AlAzzawi, S. (2014). Trade liberalisation, industry concentration and female workers: the case of Egypt. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3(1), 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-3-20

Asghar, N., Naveed, T. A., & Saleem, S. J. S. A. S. (2017). Impact of Social, Political and Economic Globalisation on Gender Inequality Index in Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis. 32(2), 415-430.

Assaf, A. A. (2018). Evaluating the Impact of Trade Openness on Women’s Job Opportunities: An Analysis for Middle East Countries. Global Journal of Economics Business, 4(1), 99-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0048157

Becker, G. S. (1971). The economics of discrimination: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041049.001.0001

Black, S. E., & Brainerd, E. (2004). Importing equality? The impact of globalisation on gender discrimination. ILR Review, 57(4), 540-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390405700404

Butz, W. P., & Ward, M. P. (1979). The emergence of countercyclical US fertility. The American economic review, 69(3), 318-328.

Carr, S. (2016). Investing in Equality: A Case for Motivating Gender Empowerment Through Foreign Direct Investment. Georgetown University.

Chami, R., Ernst, E., Fullenkamp, C., & Oeking, A. (2018). Are Remittances Good for Labor Markets in LICs, MICs and Fragile States? Evidence from Cross-Country Data. International Monetary Fund. WP/18/102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484353615.001

Darity, W. A., & Williams, R. M. (1985). Peddlers forever?: Culture, competition, and discrimination. The American economic review, 75(2), 256-261.

Erten, B., & Metzger, M. (2019). The real exchange rate, structural change, and female labor force participation. World Development, 117, 296-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.015

Gaddis, I., & Pieters, J. (2017). The gendered labor market impacts of trade liberalisation evidence from Brazil. Journal of Human Resources, 52(2), 457-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.2.1014-6690R1

Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (2002). Multinational firms and technology transfer. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 495-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00298

Hanson, G. H. (2007). Emigration, remittances and labor force participation in Mexico (Working Paper ITD= Documento de Trabajo ITD; 28): BID-INTAL.

Jaffri, A. A., Sana, M., & Asjed, R. (2015). Impact of Globalisation on Gender Inequality in Labour Market of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic Social Review, 1-16.

Juhn, C., Ujhelyi, G., & Villegas-Sanchez, C. J. J. o. D. E. (2014). Men, women, and machines: How trade impacts gender inequality. 106, 179-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.09.009

Kimura, N. (2016). Does trade liberalisation help to reduce gender inequality? A cross-country panel data analysis of wage gap. Retrieved from

Mujahid, N. (2014). Determinants of female labor force participation: A micro analysis of Pakistan. International Journal of Economics, 2(5), 211-220.

Munyo, I., & Rossi, M. A. (2015). The effects of real exchange rate fluctuations on the gender wage gap and domestic violence in Uruguay. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0000143

Nguyen, T., & Purnamasari, R. (2011). Impacts of international migration and remittances on child outcomes and labor supply in Indonesia: How does gender matter?: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5591

Oostendorp, R. (2004). Globalisation and the gender wage gap: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3256

Ouedraogo, R., & Marlet, E. (2018). Foreign direct investment and women empowerment: new evidence on developing countries: International Monetary Fund. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484339732.001

Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL521633230.011

Rasekhi, S., & Hosseinmardi, H. (2012). An impact of globalisation on gender wage inequality: A case study of selected developing countries.

Razavi, S. (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development—A commentary. 43(1), 423-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01743.x

Robertson, R., Lopez-Acevedo, G., & Savchenko, Y. (2018). Globalisation and the Gender Earnings Gap: Evidence from Sri Lanka and Cambodia 1992-2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3253480

Siegmann, K. A. (2006). Globalisation, Gender, and Equity–Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Labour Markets in Rural Indonesia. European Journal of Economics, 3(1), 113-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2006.01.09

Timmermans, C. (2014). Foreign Direct Investments and gender labour force participation: An empirical study on Sub-Saharan Africa between 1990-2009.

Vijaya, R. M., & Kaltani, L. (2007). Foreign direct investment and wages: a bargaining power approach. Journal of World-Systems Research, 13(1), 83-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2007.361

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Sana, M., & Jaffri, A. A. (2021). Gender-Based Labour Force Participation and Wage Gap in Pakistan: Does Globalization Matter. JISR Management and Social Sciences & Economics, 18(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2020.18.1.10

Issue

Section

Original Articles